Friday 20 January 2012

dept of justice

  • Question:-Why would the Bush justice dept cover up and help Obama escape the Rezko fraud?
    I see a lot of bushies here trying to make something of the Obama Rezko connection, and why the media and law are ignoring it. So yes, why would Bush appointed federal prosecuters fail to prosecute Obama? Why would Justice help out a political foe of the republicans who run the dept. Why would Bush cronies cover up for Obama and allow him to get away with federal felony fraud? WHy would Bush do this to us?

    Answer:-TROLL You lie and answer your own questions. You were undecided until their speeches. Priceless. I have busted you out all day long.
  • Question:-Since the Justice Dept. is loaded with Republican Appointees will they give the Louisiana 4 a get out of jail?
    Since the Justice Dept. is loaded with Republican Appointees will they give the Louisiana 4 a get out of jail free card?

    Answer:-That is exactly the kind of dirty tricks the Republicans are famous for. It does make you wonder why the Republicans have so many personal holds on Democrat Justice appointees does it not?
  • Question:-Why does the Obama administration Justice Dept argue for DADT?
    The Justice Department will often argue for cases contrary to positions the president has publicly taken - such as Obama favoring repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell while the Justice Department argues for the policy after courts ruled it constitutional. The Obama Justice Dept. has also written a brief that seemed to compare homosexuality to pedophilia. Is it rational for people to be outraged at this, or is the Justice Dept. just doing their job? And..what exactly is their job?

    Answer:-Obama is a mentally disturbed @sshole.
    Not only does he want DADT voided BUT he doesn't want the courts to void it he wants congress to void it!
    So he spends millions of the taxpayers hard earned money to get the same basic results but via a different method! And that's if he is successful!
    The @sshole has definite mental problems and should be impeached before he can do any more damage!
  • Question:-Why did South Carolina pass a voter suppression law so blatantly illegal the justice dept. had to step in?
    COLUMBIA, S.C. — The Justice Department on Friday rejected South Carolina's law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls, saying it makes it harder for minorities to cast ballots.

    The Justice Department must approve changes to South Carolina's election laws under the federal Voting Rights Act because of the state's past failure to protect the voting rights of blacks. It is one of nine states that require the agency's approval.

    Answer:-I don't get the legitimate objection to identifying yourself when casting a vote. I can certainly see the illegitimate reason one might not want to.

    Could you explain the objection, and how does it affect blacks one way ot the other?
  • Question:-Why would the Justice Dept. go after Gibson Guitar for wood purchase that broke some law in India and?
    totally ignore the voter intimidation and fraud by the black panthers? That was an easy case with film and witnesses and was a serious crime. Am I the only one with serious concerns about the Department of Justice?

    Answer:-Because Gibson is the ultimate responsibility where their raw material comes from and what vendors collect. They are being investigated for using endangered species of rosewood. There are endangered plant species, just as illegal to use as animals. Would you feel the same if they were using tiger skins on their instruments?

    As for those "Black Panthers" (both of them). It was investigated with no evidence of intimidation. Two guys showing off in front of a camera is not evidence of a crime, of idiocy, perhaps, but not a crime.
  • Question:-Why is it that according to US Justice dept Blacks murder at 7 times the rate of whites if you include?
    Hispanics it is 9 times so how do you explain this?

    Answer:-Please prove your claim with a link to those FBI figures not an Op/Ed piece.
  • Question:-Why did John Ashcroft cover up the boobs on the the symbol of the Justice Dept?
    Didn't he cover up the boobs on that statue? That was his first priority?! What was wrong with these republicans?

    Answer:-He was unable to deal with the guilt of what he had done to her.
  • Question:-Does the California Dept of Justice have updated information on criminal records?
    My record was expunged this past summer which was a battery misdemanor charge.I just recieved a letter from the california dept of health stating that they have recieved information from the ca dept of justice that I have been convicted with battery but the case was dismissed and which is now disturbed the peace, why is my record not showing that the case was dismissed and what can I do so I can get my license with the ca dept of health?

    Answer:-
  • Question:-Why do right wingers thinks the Justice Dept. should ignore Supreme Court ruling regarding immigration laws?
    The Supreme Court has already ruled that the Congressional power to regulate naturalization, in Article 1, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution States also includes the power to regulate immigration.

    Answer:-Because SB1070 is one step closer to the unchecked police powers, door to door searches, detainment camps and racial purification that their core members all fondly dream of every night.

    A DOJ inquiry threatens to put the brakes on their shared right wing utopia.

    The thing to remember is - liberals all ready won this battle. Jan Brewer et al issued an addendum within 2 weeks of the law passage that severely limited the most offensive parts of her misguided, politically motivated, moronic legislation.
  • Question:-If the government abolished plea bargaining, how long would it take the justice dept. To process a years wortf?
    What I mean is how long would it take them to process the average amount of cases a year, including plea bargaining, under the new system, no plea bargaining?

    Answer:-

No comments:

Post a Comment