- Question:-republican debate?
when is the republican debate? did i miss it?
Answer:-There are numerous debates. Last week, there was a "Value Voters" debate (which didn't include the boring microphone hogs that the media laughingly calls "top-tier candidates") in which Ron Paul referred to Jesus as the "Prince of Peace," called for the US to leave the UN and all other Globalist organizations, and refused to support certain unconstitutional parts of the Christian Right's agenda. The other "2nd tier" candidates pandered to the Christian Right. - Question:-....Republican Debate?
Is there any way I can re watch the republican debate (9/7/11) again online? I couldn't watch it because I had football.
Answer:-It's on YouTube (of course! Where else?)
It's in four parts. This is the first part.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM174emEhak - Question:-How has the Republican Debate been significant to Australia, shaping the nation's history?
I found this question to be very confusing and I would love some help. The whole question is "How has the Republican Debate been significant to Australia, shaping the nation's history? Will it continue to influence the history of Australia?"
I think the desired answer might be something like:
The republican debate has been significant to Australia, dominating politics, causing a referendum......etc. It will likely continue to shape the nation into the future as the debate has not been settled yet.
Please help me.
Answer:-You asked the question and you are confused by your own question?
Republicanism in Australia has been around since the Irish were brought here in ball and chain during the first fleet in 1788.
The issue of Republicanism will never die out whilst there are Irish catholics living and breathing in Australia.
The catholics are all republicans after all a Roman Caesar is the head of the Papist church and not a Papist leader in Jerusalem where you'd really think that the son of man, the saviour Christ, ought to have his manifested prophet as the Pope as resident in on Earth, and not in the Vatican City, within Italy.
Only a Roman Emperor would live in the Vatican City.
As for Anglo-Saxon Protestants well, the head of the commonwealth is the British monarch, an ex-communicated monarch with her own head of the church being the Archbishop of Canterbury, the head of the Church of England.
The denial of Catholics as being a head of an anglo-saxon nation within the commonwealth of nations has been predetermined since the Ascension edict of 1701 during the reign of Queen Anne. Her edict will deny forever a papist from ascension into Buckingham Palace. The Hanoverian monarchs have irrefutably denied all former Norman monarchs, mainly Papist as well, from ascension into the British royal families.
The desire for Australians to become a republic is as difficult to articulate to mainly WASPish majority living in Australia. People are too well entrenched with traditions and history.
The greatest threat to mainly WASPS, and protestant Pacific Islanders, is the fear of Filipino Catholics in the region. There is over 80 million catholics in South East Asia, this is frightening for Protestants in Australia and everywhere in Oceania.There is a great number of Philipines migrating into Australia per annum supported by the Catholic church which is so frightening for all Australians. - Question:-Why is the cable company refusing to put Republican Debate on the Menu for tonights debate?
Last month NBC had on their menu a Republican Debate that didn't exist , wasn't even a scheduled to be a debate. Now when there is a real DEBATE- people don't know about it because the Cable company didn't inform them on their menu's! Is the Cable Company commies now? Insight? Comcast?
Answer:-The FCC is trying to reduce the amount of violent programming. - Question:-Why did the Republican front runners decline to participate in debate?
Covenant with Black America moderated by Tavis Smiley, had a Democratic debate with ALL of the Democratic nominees, televised on June 28 at Howard University. YES they all showed up and I heard their position and plans for many issues surrounding hard working Americans. However, The Republican debate is set for September 27 at Morgan State University and these alleged front runners have declined to participate: Rudy Guiliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney & Fred Thompson.
This is ONE more reason for Republicans NOT to get my VOTE....they are not concerned with the issues involving not just African Americans, but People of Color in general and the hard working people who carry this country. Do Republicans believe they can continute to ignore the People and push their own agendas - and we won't push back? Any intelligent comments out there?
The only way for Republicans & Democrats to HEAR the PEOPLE is to address those who can't afford to pay $1000 per plate fund raisers. It appears Covenany with Black America is the only venue I've seen offering debates for both parties to address issues surrounding the common American. I'm not making this a race thing - you assume I am - I can but won't go there......so have you seen any Republicans speak to a predominately black, hispanic, native american or asian crowd? Even in the media? I haven't seen any other scheduled debates (Fox or otherwise) that was turned down by either party so if you know of any, please advise and I will definitely check it out.....Oh wait - our Hispanic community tried to organize a debate and got no response so they cancelled. Any others?
Answer:-Maybe those Republicans don't feel that everything has to be turned into a race issue.
edit: why did Obama being one of the Democrats front runners decline their recent debate in Iowa....along with others. Was it because of the mostly White elderly crowd. - Question:-Where is the exact location for the September 22 Republican debate?
The Republican presidential candidates are supposed to be coming to Orlando, Florida on Thursday, September 22 to have another debate. I've searched everywhere, and can't find an exact address for it, because I would like to go.
So, where is it, what time does it start, and how could I get in to see it in person?
Thanks.
Answer:-Orange County Convention Center - Question:-Would you rather watch the Republican debate or a rerun episode of Family Guy?
I remember when republican Gov. Snyder here in Michigan would only have a debate in the daytime when most are at work. But I guess the Republican base the retired can`t stay up until 7pm.
Answer:-I hate Family Guy. American Dad is even worse.
I'll watch the GOP debates. - Question:-Fellow Democrats: are you also itching to see the Republican nominee face Obama in a debate?
I saw that Republican debate the other night and there was no one on that stage who could go toe to toe with Obama. When you take a Conservatwit out of their cocoon and force them to face the glaring lights of reality they crumple like paper dolls.
Which of the Republican candidates from the other night do you think would humiliate themselves most blatantly in a debate with Obama?
Answer:-That'd be sweet. - Question:-What was the republican debate about?
What happened in the republican debate in Las Vegas last night? Who did it involve? What were topics of discussion? What happened?
Answer:-Maybe about who can make themselves the most un-electable in the general election.
Keep in mind that Obama care is approved of by more than 50% of Americans, they're falling all over themselves to say they'll repeal it.
Keep in mind that people aren't buying stuff, they're falling all over themselves saying that the rich need more tax cuts to create jobs, to build stuff, that people aren't buying.
The tea party wants to nominate the candidate that is least acceptable to independents in the general election. - Question:-Republican DEBATE?
I'm Canadian, but as you know we are greatly interested in who becomes the next President. I have to say, I was completely disappointed with Mitt Romney. Very Unpresidential behaviour, acting defensive, and getting upset...I suppose Huckabee in an Andy Griffith sort of way would make a Great President if this was 1955 or something..
Mccain seems like a friggin psyco. The two candidates on the ends obviously aren't in the running. Fred Thompson seems like the same guy as he does on TV. Juliani is too short to be President. That leaves Ron Paul.
its very odd that when the Dems were having their debate, everyone was cheering like crazy when the candidates were saying they will bring the troops home, yet when he suggested it, he was booed, and Mccain compared him to Hitler!!!!
Answer:-Here is how I ranked them.
1.Mike Huckabee - witty, well-prepared, and compassionate and would unite us! He is the man for the job! Death penalty skate, but I understand why!
2.John McCain - affirmed that he is the a well respected veteran and would Lead well.
3.Mitt Romney - bickering with Rudy made him look petty; comments on torture made him seem wise and made McCain seem cold and on the attack! Comments on Confederate flag non-issue.
4.Ron Paul - didn't respond well to McCain's attacks; rant about North American Union conspiracy made him seem too extreme.
5.Duncan Hunter – Faired well, not much time, but all answers were good! He would be a great VEEP to Huckabee!
6.Tom Tancredo – Good on one issue: Immigration, but he ranks high on my candidate calculator, so candidate for VEEP too!
7.Fred Thompson - not heard from very much, seemed poorly prepared and confused. Not very articulate and disappointing. Sounded like he was trying out for VEEP.
8.Rudy Giuliani - bickering with Romney made him look petty, if I have to listen to his stats about NY one more time, I will PUKE!
VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE!
Showing posts with label republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label republicans. Show all posts
Friday, 27 January 2012
republican debate
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
state of the union
- Question:-Is the State of the Union Address really just a pep-rally?
Every year it sounds the same. It's not like anything will change tomorrow after tonight's pep-rally. Congress claps at this propaganda to make themselves feel better don't they know that 80% of America hates their frickin' guts.
I wish somebody would yell "You lie" and a fist-fight broke out. At least then I would feel represented.
Answer:- - Question:-Did Obamas state of the Union Speech go like this?
Politicans like me have chased jobs overseas. This is all politics. I'm trying to re-elected. We have a gigantic mess. It wasn't for me things would be soo much worse. And if it we'rent for me it would be much worse.
Would the only truthful statement be he inherited a mess? That instead of cleaning it up i made it worse? That instead of changing. I changed the size of the mistakes 10x bigger? And the only thing standing between us and oblivion is cheap debt?
Answer:- - Question:-What was the most divisive thing President Obama said in his State of the Union Address?
I keep hearing Obama Haters saying it was divisive but they never provide an exact quote from the speech.
As I suspected no exact quotes.
Answer:- - Question:-Why are republican leaders attacking Obama on the state of the union speech early?
Mittens mcconnel and boner all have attacked it.
They know it will be good and they can't beat it
Answer:- - Question:-What is the state of the union of Yahoo! Answers?
BQ - are you watching the State of the Union tonight
Answer:-Slow
BQ I did - Question:-is my inability to pay attention to the state of the union address for 5 consecutive minutes?
(a) a symptom of mommy-brain, akin to being unable to remember that the coffee is on the roof of my car or putting the dog leash in the refrigerator;
(b) a symptom of too much time on y!a rotting my brain cells; or
(c) something to do with the speech itself
do you ever feel like you've lost a significant number of brain cells since having kids?
shoot, now i've put myself in a position where i have to thumb up a bunch of conservatives. ;-)
Answer:-Let me put it this way....I am watching an episode of Chopped. :o)
I can't listen to the guy for more than a minute, anyway. - Question:-Did you see Hilary Clinton on the State of the Union address?
What do you think? To me she kind of looklike she had the flu
Answer:- - Question:-Did Obama just use basically the same speech as his last State of the Union speech?
Sounded almost exactly the same, with some added BS.
Answer:- - Question:-What did republicans like about obamas state of the union address 2011?
Answer:-Obama's the wrong color for the republicans, so I doubt they liked much of anything about anything. - Question:-Will Obama attack Gingrich or Romney during his state of the union?
do u think he will throw in a zineger?
Answer:-
Friday, 20 January 2012
dept of justice
- Question:-Why would the Bush justice dept cover up and help Obama escape the Rezko fraud?
I see a lot of bushies here trying to make something of the Obama Rezko connection, and why the media and law are ignoring it. So yes, why would Bush appointed federal prosecuters fail to prosecute Obama? Why would Justice help out a political foe of the republicans who run the dept. Why would Bush cronies cover up for Obama and allow him to get away with federal felony fraud? WHy would Bush do this to us?
Answer:-TROLL You lie and answer your own questions. You were undecided until their speeches. Priceless. I have busted you out all day long. - Question:-Since the Justice Dept. is loaded with Republican Appointees will they give the Louisiana 4 a get out of jail?
Since the Justice Dept. is loaded with Republican Appointees will they give the Louisiana 4 a get out of jail free card?
Answer:-That is exactly the kind of dirty tricks the Republicans are famous for. It does make you wonder why the Republicans have so many personal holds on Democrat Justice appointees does it not? - Question:-Why does the Obama administration Justice Dept argue for DADT?
The Justice Department will often argue for cases contrary to positions the president has publicly taken - such as Obama favoring repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell while the Justice Department argues for the policy after courts ruled it constitutional. The Obama Justice Dept. has also written a brief that seemed to compare homosexuality to pedophilia. Is it rational for people to be outraged at this, or is the Justice Dept. just doing their job? And..what exactly is their job?
Answer:-Obama is a mentally disturbed @sshole.
Not only does he want DADT voided BUT he doesn't want the courts to void it he wants congress to void it!
So he spends millions of the taxpayers hard earned money to get the same basic results but via a different method! And that's if he is successful!
The @sshole has definite mental problems and should be impeached before he can do any more damage! - Question:-Why did South Carolina pass a voter suppression law so blatantly illegal the justice dept. had to step in?
COLUMBIA, S.C. — The Justice Department on Friday rejected South Carolina's law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls, saying it makes it harder for minorities to cast ballots.
The Justice Department must approve changes to South Carolina's election laws under the federal Voting Rights Act because of the state's past failure to protect the voting rights of blacks. It is one of nine states that require the agency's approval.
Answer:-I don't get the legitimate objection to identifying yourself when casting a vote. I can certainly see the illegitimate reason one might not want to.
Could you explain the objection, and how does it affect blacks one way ot the other? - Question:-Why would the Justice Dept. go after Gibson Guitar for wood purchase that broke some law in India and?
totally ignore the voter intimidation and fraud by the black panthers? That was an easy case with film and witnesses and was a serious crime. Am I the only one with serious concerns about the Department of Justice?
Answer:-Because Gibson is the ultimate responsibility where their raw material comes from and what vendors collect. They are being investigated for using endangered species of rosewood. There are endangered plant species, just as illegal to use as animals. Would you feel the same if they were using tiger skins on their instruments?
As for those "Black Panthers" (both of them). It was investigated with no evidence of intimidation. Two guys showing off in front of a camera is not evidence of a crime, of idiocy, perhaps, but not a crime. - Question:-Why is it that according to US Justice dept Blacks murder at 7 times the rate of whites if you include?
Hispanics it is 9 times so how do you explain this?
Answer:-Please prove your claim with a link to those FBI figures not an Op/Ed piece. - Question:-Why did John Ashcroft cover up the boobs on the the symbol of the Justice Dept?
Didn't he cover up the boobs on that statue? That was his first priority?! What was wrong with these republicans?
Answer:-He was unable to deal with the guilt of what he had done to her. - Question:-Does the California Dept of Justice have updated information on criminal records?
My record was expunged this past summer which was a battery misdemanor charge.I just recieved a letter from the california dept of health stating that they have recieved information from the ca dept of justice that I have been convicted with battery but the case was dismissed and which is now disturbed the peace, why is my record not showing that the case was dismissed and what can I do so I can get my license with the ca dept of health?
Answer:- - Question:-Why do right wingers thinks the Justice Dept. should ignore Supreme Court ruling regarding immigration laws?
The Supreme Court has already ruled that the Congressional power to regulate naturalization, in Article 1, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution States also includes the power to regulate immigration.
Answer:-Because SB1070 is one step closer to the unchecked police powers, door to door searches, detainment camps and racial purification that their core members all fondly dream of every night.
A DOJ inquiry threatens to put the brakes on their shared right wing utopia.
The thing to remember is - liberals all ready won this battle. Jan Brewer et al issued an addendum within 2 weeks of the law passage that severely limited the most offensive parts of her misguided, politically motivated, moronic legislation. - Question:-If the government abolished plea bargaining, how long would it take the justice dept. To process a years wortf?
What I mean is how long would it take them to process the average amount of cases a year, including plea bargaining, under the new system, no plea bargaining?
Answer:-
republican debate
- Question:-republican debate?
when is the republican debate? did i miss it?
Answer:-There are numerous debates. Last week, there was a "Value Voters" debate (which didn't include the boring microphone hogs that the media laughingly calls "top-tier candidates") in which Ron Paul referred to Jesus as the "Prince of Peace," called for the US to leave the UN and all other Globalist organizations, and refused to support certain unconstitutional parts of the Christian Right's agenda. The other "2nd tier" candidates pandered to the Christian Right. - Question:-....Republican Debate?
Is there any way I can re watch the republican debate (9/7/11) again online? I couldn't watch it because I had football.
Answer:-It's on YouTube (of course! Where else?)
It's in four parts. This is the first part.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM174emEhak - Question:-How has the Republican Debate been significant to Australia, shaping the nation's history?
I found this question to be very confusing and I would love some help. The whole question is "How has the Republican Debate been significant to Australia, shaping the nation's history? Will it continue to influence the history of Australia?"
I think the desired answer might be something like:
The republican debate has been significant to Australia, dominating politics, causing a referendum......etc. It will likely continue to shape the nation into the future as the debate has not been settled yet.
Please help me.
Answer:-You asked the question and you are confused by your own question?
Republicanism in Australia has been around since the Irish were brought here in ball and chain during the first fleet in 1788.
The issue of Republicanism will never die out whilst there are Irish catholics living and breathing in Australia.
The catholics are all republicans after all a Roman Caesar is the head of the Papist church and not a Papist leader in Jerusalem where you'd really think that the son of man, the saviour Christ, ought to have his manifested prophet as the Pope as resident in on Earth, and not in the Vatican City, within Italy.
Only a Roman Emperor would live in the Vatican City.
As for Anglo-Saxon Protestants well, the head of the commonwealth is the British monarch, an ex-communicated monarch with her own head of the church being the Archbishop of Canterbury, the head of the Church of England.
The denial of Catholics as being a head of an anglo-saxon nation within the commonwealth of nations has been predetermined since the Ascension edict of 1701 during the reign of Queen Anne. Her edict will deny forever a papist from ascension into Buckingham Palace. The Hanoverian monarchs have irrefutably denied all former Norman monarchs, mainly Papist as well, from ascension into the British royal families.
The desire for Australians to become a republic is as difficult to articulate to mainly WASPish majority living in Australia. People are too well entrenched with traditions and history.
The greatest threat to mainly WASPS, and protestant Pacific Islanders, is the fear of Filipino Catholics in the region. There is over 80 million catholics in South East Asia, this is frightening for Protestants in Australia and everywhere in Oceania.There is a great number of Philipines migrating into Australia per annum supported by the Catholic church which is so frightening for all Australians. - Question:-Why is the cable company refusing to put Republican Debate on the Menu for tonights debate?
Last month NBC had on their menu a Republican Debate that didn't exist , wasn't even a scheduled to be a debate. Now when there is a real DEBATE- people don't know about it because the Cable company didn't inform them on their menu's! Is the Cable Company commies now? Insight? Comcast?
Answer:-The FCC is trying to reduce the amount of violent programming. - Question:-Why did the Republican front runners decline to participate in debate?
Covenant with Black America moderated by Tavis Smiley, had a Democratic debate with ALL of the Democratic nominees, televised on June 28 at Howard University. YES they all showed up and I heard their position and plans for many issues surrounding hard working Americans. However, The Republican debate is set for September 27 at Morgan State University and these alleged front runners have declined to participate: Rudy Guiliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney & Fred Thompson.
This is ONE more reason for Republicans NOT to get my VOTE....they are not concerned with the issues involving not just African Americans, but People of Color in general and the hard working people who carry this country. Do Republicans believe they can continute to ignore the People and push their own agendas - and we won't push back? Any intelligent comments out there?
The only way for Republicans & Democrats to HEAR the PEOPLE is to address those who can't afford to pay $1000 per plate fund raisers. It appears Covenany with Black America is the only venue I've seen offering debates for both parties to address issues surrounding the common American. I'm not making this a race thing - you assume I am - I can but won't go there......so have you seen any Republicans speak to a predominately black, hispanic, native american or asian crowd? Even in the media? I haven't seen any other scheduled debates (Fox or otherwise) that was turned down by either party so if you know of any, please advise and I will definitely check it out.....Oh wait - our Hispanic community tried to organize a debate and got no response so they cancelled. Any others?
Answer:-Maybe those Republicans don't feel that everything has to be turned into a race issue.
edit: why did Obama being one of the Democrats front runners decline their recent debate in Iowa....along with others. Was it because of the mostly White elderly crowd. - Question:-Where is the exact location for the September 22 Republican debate?
The Republican presidential candidates are supposed to be coming to Orlando, Florida on Thursday, September 22 to have another debate. I've searched everywhere, and can't find an exact address for it, because I would like to go.
So, where is it, what time does it start, and how could I get in to see it in person?
Thanks.
Answer:-Orange County Convention Center - Question:-Would you rather watch the Republican debate or a rerun episode of Family Guy?
I remember when republican Gov. Snyder here in Michigan would only have a debate in the daytime when most are at work. But I guess the Republican base the retired can`t stay up until 7pm.
Answer:-I hate Family Guy. American Dad is even worse.
I'll watch the GOP debates. - Question:-Fellow Democrats: are you also itching to see the Republican nominee face Obama in a debate?
I saw that Republican debate the other night and there was no one on that stage who could go toe to toe with Obama. When you take a Conservatwit out of their cocoon and force them to face the glaring lights of reality they crumple like paper dolls.
Which of the Republican candidates from the other night do you think would humiliate themselves most blatantly in a debate with Obama?
Answer:-That'd be sweet. - Question:-What was the republican debate about?
What happened in the republican debate in Las Vegas last night? Who did it involve? What were topics of discussion? What happened?
Answer:-Maybe about who can make themselves the most un-electable in the general election.
Keep in mind that Obama care is approved of by more than 50% of Americans, they're falling all over themselves to say they'll repeal it.
Keep in mind that people aren't buying stuff, they're falling all over themselves saying that the rich need more tax cuts to create jobs, to build stuff, that people aren't buying.
The tea party wants to nominate the candidate that is least acceptable to independents in the general election. - Question:-Republican DEBATE?
I'm Canadian, but as you know we are greatly interested in who becomes the next President. I have to say, I was completely disappointed with Mitt Romney. Very Unpresidential behaviour, acting defensive, and getting upset...I suppose Huckabee in an Andy Griffith sort of way would make a Great President if this was 1955 or something..
Mccain seems like a friggin psyco. The two candidates on the ends obviously aren't in the running. Fred Thompson seems like the same guy as he does on TV. Juliani is too short to be President. That leaves Ron Paul.
its very odd that when the Dems were having their debate, everyone was cheering like crazy when the candidates were saying they will bring the troops home, yet when he suggested it, he was booed, and Mccain compared him to Hitler!!!!
Answer:-Here is how I ranked them.
1.Mike Huckabee - witty, well-prepared, and compassionate and would unite us! He is the man for the job! Death penalty skate, but I understand why!
2.John McCain - affirmed that he is the a well respected veteran and would Lead well.
3.Mitt Romney - bickering with Rudy made him look petty; comments on torture made him seem wise and made McCain seem cold and on the attack! Comments on Confederate flag non-issue.
4.Ron Paul - didn't respond well to McCain's attacks; rant about North American Union conspiracy made him seem too extreme.
5.Duncan Hunter – Faired well, not much time, but all answers were good! He would be a great VEEP to Huckabee!
6.Tom Tancredo – Good on one issue: Immigration, but he ranks high on my candidate calculator, so candidate for VEEP too!
7.Fred Thompson - not heard from very much, seemed poorly prepared and confused. Not very articulate and disappointing. Sounded like he was trying out for VEEP.
8.Rudy Giuliani - bickering with Romney made him look petty, if I have to listen to his stats about NY one more time, I will PUKE!
VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE!
Thursday, 19 January 2012
keystone xl
- Question:-Why are Conservatives trying to portray the job-killing Keystone XL pipeline as a job creator?
The construction phase of the Keystone XL pipeline will mean temporary construction jobs, but once construction is complete it will only require a staff of approximately 120 workers to keep the pipeline operating. Furthermore, completion of the pipeline will mean the loss of thousands of trucking and railroad jobs, and lead to an increase in fuel prices in North America.
The Keystone XL Pipeline is not a job creator, it's a job destroyer, so why are Republicans behind the 8-ball on this one and swallowing everything TransCanada tells them?
Answer:-Because they are stupid. - Question:-Why is the Keystone XL Pipeline a Bad Idea?
Why is it a bad idea to extract fuel from the tar ands and transport it south? I've heard the project to be considered one of the dirtiest projects on earth, and there are international groups strongly opposing the idea. I just want to know why this is.
Also, if you have an extra second, can you clarify what the Keystone Pipeline actually is? All I know is that it runs from Canada where the tar sands are to the Gulf of Mexico... I think. Thanks!
It sounds like a good idea to me too, but how come it's got everyone all stirred up?
Answer:-I don't believe that it is a bad idea. It serves as a means of transporting a valuable energy source from source to market. - Question:-Why did House Republicans add the Keystone XL rider to the payroll tax renewal bill?
Everyone can see what a blatant political game they are playing here. So the question is why did they play it?
Is this really what the call governing?
Answer:-Same old shi4... Obstructionism. - Question:-Why build the Keystone XL pipeline when we have excellent railroads operating over the same territory?
The Canadian, UP and BNSF railways haul unit tank car trains and they have proved they can move large quanitys of coal from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. By adding 13 unit trains per day they could handle the proposed 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
Answer:-Because a pipeline is a cheaper method of transporting liquids over long distances. A pipeline can pump liquids continually 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. - Question:-How come Republican Governors don't want the Keystone XL Pipeline anywhere near their state?
how bad is it for the environment?
is it worth the temporary 6k jobs?
would you want in your state near your water?
Answer:- - Question:-Why won't Republicans take responsibility for the rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline?
Republicans forced the issue by giving Obama only 60 days to review the pipeline's impact on the environment, which isn't enough time, so he erred on the side of environment over Big Oil.
If it had more time, the administration could have developed a new route that had a lot less environmental risk.
But, of course, the GOP won't take responsibility.
Answer:- - Question:-Why are Conservatives trying to paint the Keystone XL pipeline as a Unions versus Environmentalists story and?
completely ignoring the states rights issues involved in the environmental review process of a project of this size? Even if Obama had issued a permit it wouldn't have been binding because it would have been deemed a violation of the states rights doctrine and ruled to be an unenforceable permit.
Is this more of the Republican strategy of "Just keep repeating the lie and hope that people start to believe it"?
Answer:- - Question:-Why did the House republicans attach the Keystone XL Canada-to-Texas pipeline project to the payroll tax cuts?
One has nothing to do with the other, so why not just vote on a straight payroll tax cut with no strings attached?
Answer:-This is how laws are passed in this country (no matter which party is in power). Wording that has nothing to do with the title of the bill up for discussion is added and buried in the hopes too few will read the full bill and see it. Usually this pork is added to bills that are important and congress wants to pass quickly, this gives the unrelated wording more of a chance to be over looked.
Personally, I'm 100% behind legislating a one bill one issue policy. It would slow things down and force members of congress to be fully accountable for the laws they are purposing. - Question:-How come Obama opposes creating real shovel ready jobs with the Keystone XL Pipeline?
How come Obama is against helping the working class middle man? How come Obama is against being independent from his Muslim Brotherhood of Oil barons
Answer:-Because cheaper oil makes it harder to create false demand for green-scheme energy. - Question:-Keystone XL creates almost no jobs. Why are union leaders, which support 0bama, too stupid to realize that no?
.... jobs will be created by the Keystone XL pipeline?
Are all Democrats or just most Democrats that stupid?
--- It is supported by AFL-CIO, Teamsters, IBEW, Jimmy Hoffa, etc.
Are those unions, their leaders, and their members all just a complete bunch of idiots for supporting something that creates almost no jobs ?
Don't you love when Liberal environmentalists imply union members and union leaders who want the pipeline built are a bunch of idiots ?
Answer:-
keystone pipeline
- Question:-How is Obama explain the thousands of jobs lost from the Keystone Pipeline to the American people?
Now that Obama has killed the Keystone Pipeline how is he going to explain the thousands of potential jobs lost to the American people? My guess he is going to blame the Republicans some how. What do you think?
Answer:- - Question:-Why is the Keystone XL Pipeline a Bad Idea?
Why is it a bad idea to extract fuel from the tar ands and transport it south? I've heard the project to be considered one of the dirtiest projects on earth, and there are international groups strongly opposing the idea. I just want to know why this is.
Also, if you have an extra second, can you clarify what the Keystone Pipeline actually is? All I know is that it runs from Canada where the tar sands are to the Gulf of Mexico... I think. Thanks!
It sounds like a good idea to me too, but how come it's got everyone all stirred up?
Answer:-I don't believe that it is a bad idea. It serves as a means of transporting a valuable energy source from source to market. - Question:-Why is this idiodic Keystone Pipeline project part of the tax deal?
Fossil fuel is not the answer and the keystone project is not a tax! It is unrelated to the economy and jobs. Pipelines don;t produce jobs anyway, thats why republicans want them so much. This 30 inch pipeline will further escalate CO2 and global warming also. Plus if it explodes it will cause serious catastrophes and pollute the groundwater.
The pipeline will cost more than its worth right out of the gate!!!
Answer:-If the pipeline is such a bad idea, why doesn't President Obama turn it down right now, instead of trying to wait until after the next election? Could it be that he is placating you and the rest of enviro nuts, while promising the unions that he will OK the project after his re-election?
PS. If you think the pipeline will not affect the economy and jobs, you are a complete moron. - Question:-Why are radical environmentalists trying to prevent the Keystone Pipeline?
The Keystone Pipeline will help the US move toward energy independence and it will create at least 100,000 jobs.
Answer:-Firstly, it is not (just) radical environmentalists that are trying to prevent the Keystone Pipeline, it is people who work with that natural world as a whole, and people who think that there are plenty of alternatives to this project, and people such as: ecologists, zoologists, geographers and botanists are all against this proposition. It is because the ecosystems and boreal forests that exist on top of the 'tar sands' which are so fragile and valuable that there is much controversy over the pipeline. the act of mining for the oil itself is incredibly destructive, and as well as producing CO2 emissions and other greenhouse gasses, ancient woodlands and habitat that can never be replaced is cut down, again reducing a large carbon sink that helps to reduce CO2 levels. The mining also has other impacts, such as poisoning rivers and lakes with pollutants and has the potential to decimate local fishing jobs and again, destroy an irreplaceable ecosystem. The pipeline itself poses another threat, as many of the companies involved (such as shell) have proved in the past that they cannot control or stop leaks and spills of oil, and so no matter how they may say that they can ensure an environmental catastrophe does not happen, it cannot be proved as previous events have to be taken into account.
Looking at the idea of energy independence, although admittedly, would - for a time - be a greater energy security for the USA and Canada, would in the long term be disastrous for their energy security. By continuing to consume vast quantities of oil (and other fossil fuels) they risk falling behind the rest of the world. As oil dependency would inevitably continue to increase, more and more would be required from other sources, such as Iran and Saudi Arabia. The tar sands will eventually run out, and if 100,000+ people are working at this facility, when it runs dry (which is inevitable) there will be been more people unemployed than originally were. Although for a few years the economy would be boosted, in the long term it would lead to a wider scale unemployment and America having a higher dependency on higher price overseas oil from countries that could potentially charge as much as they want.
Even if you don't think man-made global warming is occurring you can see that oil is not the long term solution for energy independence anywhere because it will run out and leave anyone still dependent on it in a critical situation as they will have a serious energy problem.
So these are the main points that are being put across by the opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline, and they are many in number. It may go down to politics and the way in which many oil companies pay off politicians in order to get their own way but if it goes forward, then in the long run, America, Canada, the environment and the public as a whole will be worse off. - Question:-Do the states that would have the most to gain from the Keystone pipeline have anything in common?
The proposed Keystone pipeline would pass through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas.
Do these states have anything in common that could influence the decision to approve or reject the project?
Answer:- - Question:-Is OBAMA intentionally hurting economy by fighting yearlong tax cut extension &blocking Keystone Pipeline jobs?
The Keystone Pipeline would create thousands of jobs instantly and lower the price of gas immediately as speculators bet on the price to drop in the long run.....
And extending the tax cut for a whole year will provide more certainty thankicking the can down the road for a month.....
Is OBAMA intentionally sabatoging economy in order to blame his problems on Republicans?
Is the press covering this story fairly?
Answer:- - Question:-Where are cons getting their numbers for the Keystone pipeline? They keep changing?
Also why did cons oppose the American Jobs Act that would put hundreds of thousands of laborers to work improving our infrastructure, but approve of a pipeline that even Keystone claims would make minimal jobs for only two years?
Answer:-Kind of like how the libs keep changing the way they figure out unemployment, payroll tax, etc, in order to skew things in their Messiah's favor? We opposed the American Jobs Act because it was just Porkulus, part II...as the old saying goes, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig. Democrats feed off of emotion, and ignorance...and people are starting to wake up now and figure it out. - Question:-Why are Conservatives trying to portray the job-killing Keystone XL pipeline as a job creator?
The construction phase of the Keystone XL pipeline will mean temporary construction jobs, but once construction is complete it will only require a staff of approximately 120 workers to keep the pipeline operating. Furthermore, completion of the pipeline will mean the loss of thousands of trucking and railroad jobs, and lead to an increase in fuel prices in North America.
The Keystone XL Pipeline is not a job creator, it's a job destroyer, so why are Republicans behind the 8-ball on this one and swallowing everything TransCanada tells them?
Answer:-Because they are stupid. - Question:-Why is Obama blocking jobs by not supporting the Keystone Pipeline?
The House voted yesterday to extend payroll tax cuts as Obama wants and to support shovel ready jobs thru construction of the Keystone Pipeline. Obama says he'll veto the measure
Answer:- - Question:-Dems, should 0bama build the Keystone pipeline to create union jobs or cancel it to save the planet?
"....A slew of unions are backing the project, including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Union of Operating Engineers, the Teamsters, the Laborers’ International Union, the Building and Construction Trades Department of the AFL-CIO, and the United Association of Plumbers and Pipe Fitters for the United States and Canada...."
Yet, there are 1000s of 0bama's greenies protesting against the pipeline that unions want.
Answer:-Rock and a hard place on that one. My guess is that jobs will win the day. People need jobs in this country.
That may be why Republicans are filibustering every jobs bill. They want to force his hand on that pipeline.
Monday, 16 January 2012
jon huntsman
- Question:-Jon Huntsman: as corporations make record profits, does the government have a role in reining in corporate pow?
Jon Huntsman
You said it is “criminal” for corporations to use loopholes in order to avoid paying their tax burden, including GE not paying a dime on $5.1 billion in profits last year. And while you support loopholes, you say you would oppose tax reform that increased the tax burden. But as corporations make record profits, does the government have a role in reining in corporate power? If so, how?
Answer:-The corporations are running the show at the moment. - Question:-Can the Social Liberal Republican and possible presidential contender, Jon Huntsman beat Obama?
The St. Petersburg Times said about him in this morning's edition, "Maybe what it takes to shake up the humdrum Republican presidential contest is a super-rich foreign policy ace who rides a Harley, cuts taxes and supported legislation to allow civil unions for gay couples." Is Jon Huntsman the man who can beat Obama?
Answer:-Why would anybody want to try to beat Obama? - Question:-What is the to know about Jon Huntsman?
Hey everyone, I'm just wondering if anyone could kind of summarize the political views of Jon Huntsman, one of the few candidates who actually appears to be normal.
So far, even though he is old and crazy, I really am liking Ron Paul as his views seem to be a lot more reasonable than his ultra-conservative opponents.
Answer:-I like Jon Huntsman, he is good. - Question:-Why does it seem Jon Huntsman is the only sane and intelligent candidate in the GOP?
I do have some respect for Ron Paul....but...
Jon Huntsman seems like the real deal. He genuinely seems to care for this country and doesn't seem self-seeking. He doesn't scapegoat or antagonize certain countries unlike Mitt Romney, D Trump, Bachman, etc. He keeps his composure and his success in Utah is #1 out of all states!
Answer:-I agree, but the Republicans seem to want him to remain in the background. Perhaps, they only allow one Mormon at a time. I like Huntsman who seems to be more Liberal, he doesn't personally attack people like the Republicans usually do, and he is good friends with Obama. The GOP is in big trouble, they seem to be falling apart which is probably why no suitable candidate had decided to run. It will be years before the GOP can get rid of the smell of Bush and Cheney. The Tea Party, Grover Norquist or Paul Ryan hasn't helped the Republican party with their Fascists idealizations.
I wouldn't be surprised if another political Party grows out of the ashes of the decaying Republican Party, perhaps Libertarians. This is what has happened to European Countries in the past. - Question:-Why hasn't Jon Huntsman been more popular on the republican debate?
I apologize if I sound ignorant or unaware, but I just finished up watching the New Hampshire debate (I'm just now getting more "into" politics) and I noticed that not too many people were fond about Jon Huntsman, and-in my opinion-I felt as if he deserved more popularity.
Answer:-Hard to figure, really. My guess is that Republicans are unwilling to forgive him for accepting a job as ambassador to China from Obama. They figure such a show of non-partisan patriotism is disloyal.
I agree with you: he's the best of the GOP's rather pitiful bunch. - Question:-Can you believe that I actually found a Republican that I respect, and his name is Jon Huntsman?
Of course I still will vote for President Obama, but I find Jon Huntsman's Civil Tone refreshing. He also worked in the Obama Administration, which shows his willingness to work outside his Party.
But I know the fact that he worked for President Obama will ruin his chance of ever becoming hte Republican Nominee. But he seems like a good and decent person nevertheless.
Answer:-I agree with you, which is probably why the rest of the republicans won't pick him. Huntsman make them look really, really bad. - Question:-Republicans what do you think of Jon Huntsman?
What do you think of Jon Huntsman?
The former Governor of Utah who is running for President.
Answer:-He's either a man with some honor and integrity OR a man pretending to have honor and integrity for his political gain. - Question:-Why are Republicans so dumb as to not support the only possible winner they have, Jon Huntsman?
I can't find any sense in the fact that Jon Huntsman is last in the polls
Answer:-I'm a Republican and I like Jon Huntsman. He's not a warmonger like Bachmann and Santorum who have zero chance of beating Obama. He has a great record as governor. He cut taxes and created jobs. Too bad the establishment Republicans can't let go of big military spending. - Question:-Conservatives, why do you prefer Newt Gingrich over Jon Huntsman?
Jon Huntsman can be a formidable opponent for Obama, and he makes a far better example of conservative thought than Newt Gingrich with his terrible past and temperament. Why do you still prefer Newt Gingrich?
Answer:-I haven't been watching TV or reading the paper, but chances are whoever conservatives are supporting, is the candidate the media is causing them to support.
You wouldn't have half the population voting for the interests of the 1%, unless they're getting fed propaganda by the media. - Question:-Could Republican Presidential Candidate Jon Huntsman become a sex symbol?
http://whitehouse2012.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/jon-huntsman-official-web.jpg
He's got that "yeah, if I tried to kiss you, you'd resist at first, but after a few seconds you might give in a little just to see what it felt like" look to him.
Answer:-yes, to the likes of ted haggard, mark foley and larry craig, among many others in the gop...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)