south carolina primary results

• Question:-Results of the South Carolina Primary?
  What were the results of the democratic and republican primary in South Carolina(the best place in the WORLD!!)?
  
  Answer:-In the democratic primary Obama was the winner and Hillary came on second. On the republican primary the winner was McCain followed by Huckabee and Romney.
• Question:-You think the South Carolina primary result is a sample....?
  ....as to just how ticked off the electorit is and the bull$hit in Washington?
  How about Obama and the democratic caucus, you think they're starting to seriously scratch their heads in worry about November? How many more hammers need to fall on these dence dems before they get it?
  
  Answer:-There is not enough hammers in the world to hit their dense, (brainwashed skulls). They will NEVER get it.
• Question:-Should Ron Paul drop put due to the results of the SOUTH CAROLINA Primary? If not, why or why so?
  
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Why did John McCain survive 5 1/2 years as a prisoner of war, but gave up after the South Carolina primary?
  Every time I hear John McCain say "Stand up and fight !", I have to wince.
  
  The reason why I have to wince is because I still find it hard to believe how
  easily he gave up in the 2000 Republican presidential primary.
  
  He sure didn't "stand up and fight" back then !
  
  He endured all of that abuse for 5 1/2 years in Vietnam, but gave up after losing in the South Carolina Primary as a result of ugly rumors circulated by Karl Rove in the Bush campaign.
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Who won the south carolina primary?
  didn't they say the results would be in @ 730?
  WHAT? NOOOOOOO:(
  does anyone know where Ron Paul placed?
  
  Answer:-Newt Gingrich, I'm certain.
  
  Edit: I think Ron Paul and Rick Santorum are fighting for 3rd place. Keep in mind that these results are based on early exit polls...
• Question:-Since voters in South Carolina don't register by party, Saturday's primary is open to any registered voters..?
  ...in the state?
  Could Democrats be turning out to vote in order to skew the results of the election?
  Thus giving a nationally unelectable candidate the GOP victory?
  
  http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/democrats-not-voting-south-carolina-primary-local-chairwoman-141123818.html
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Does South Carolina have two primary election dates?
  They are announcing results for Republicans on Jan. 19, but it seems like Democratic election date is Jan. 26?
  
  Answer:-Yes. Democratic primary will be on January 26, exatly one week after the Republican Primary on January 19.
• Question:-What the hell happened in the South Carolina Democratic primary?? (How did a guy with no signs & no money win)?
  Clyburn (D-SC) seems to think something shady took place.
  
  In contrast, the Democratic establishment seems stunned and embarrassed like they want this situation to go away.
  
  What happened??
  
  http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/608225;_ylt=ApeGnC3CYbrxLow4gBa.glCyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTJlczhtYjJwBGFzc2V0A2h1ZmZwb3N0LzIwMTAwNjEwLzYwODIyNQRjcG9zAzMEcG9zAzE4BHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA2FsdmluZ3JlZW5lZA--
  
  The Democratic Party apparatus in the state of South Carolina has begun raising serious concerns that the shocking victory of Alvin Greene in the Senate Democratic primary this Tuesday may have been the result of nefarious meddling.
  
  Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) the senior black lawmaker in the state, made the case in various interviews on Thursday. State Party Chair Carol Fowler echoed the same point, while also calling on Greene to leave the race because of recent revelations of prior felony charges.
  
  But for all the hints of shenanigans -- and Greene's election is, if anything, truly bizarre -- the national party infrastructure wants nothing more than to sweep the issue under the rug.
  
  "The committee looks at the entire electoral map and decides where it will be spending its best time and resources," Democratic Senate Campaign Committee Chair Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said on Thursday in a briefing for reporters. "And I have to be honest with you that South Carolina is not a place that I am focused on.
  john gibson............."because he got the most votes,would be the reason why"
  
  Yes. But that means people just picked somebody without knowing who it was.
  tyler...............Yes it appears he did. It's just so odd.
  
  Answer:-I would just like to know how a guy with no job and living at home with his parents was able to get $10,000 to file with the state to be on the ballot.
• Question:-Why did Democrats in South Carolina wait until after the primary losses to complain about candidates?
  " I saw the patterns in this. I know a Democratic pattern, I know a Republican pattern, and I saw in the Democratic primary, elephant dung all over the place. So I knew something was wrong in that primary. And this result tells us that." according to James Clyburn. So why didn't a single Democrat object to Greene's candidacy prior to election day? Even Obama is complaining after the fact with Axelrod saying that "South Carolina deserves a strong Democratic candidate". It seams obvious that the people of South Carolina don't want the long term politicians at all since most were defeated. So is it really a surprise that an unknown won?
  Bob: Many accusations have been made but not one shred of evidence has been shown as proof of any of the accusations. The only thing the Democrats have is to say (paraphrase) " There must be something wrong because it is strange."
  Sorry I mis-spoke like Obama does so often. I meant that they were either defeated or had much tougher races than they had in the past.
  
  Answer:-Identifying it as a "primary loss" is incorrect.
  
  Prior to election day Alvin Greene was not known. He was unemployed, living with his father, facing felony charges and not at all active in the Democratic party in South Carolina. It's a primary where Democrats invested little because of a "certain" win by DeMint in November.
  
  Still, it says something about the number of uncontested races in this country given that it is an "anti incumbency" year.
  
  I think that you need to go back and check your facts concerning "most were defeated". Of 84 incumbents running in the elections last Tuesday, only two were defeated - one of those being a regular scoundrel (under many investigations - gov of Nevada).
• Question:-If Huckabee couldn't win in South Carolina or Florida what makes Santorum think he can?
  Santorum couldn't even win in Iowa which has the largest evangelical vote of any primary or caucus.
  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29_presidential_primaries_results%2C_2008.svg
  McCain won both of those states. So much for Romney not being able to win in the South. LOL
  
  Answer:-Right now, Santorum is the "Not Romney" candidate of the week. Let's see what he looks like after Romney starts flinging dirt all over him, like he did to Newt and Cain.

dept of justice

• Question:-Why would the Bush justice dept cover up and help Obama escape the Rezko fraud?
  I see a lot of bushies here trying to make something of the Obama Rezko connection, and why the media and law are ignoring it. So yes, why would Bush appointed federal prosecuters fail to prosecute Obama? Why would Justice help out a political foe of the republicans who run the dept. Why would Bush cronies cover up for Obama and allow him to get away with federal felony fraud? WHy would Bush do this to us?
  
  Answer:-TROLL You lie and answer your own questions. You were undecided until their speeches. Priceless. I have busted you out all day long.
• Question:-Since the Justice Dept. is loaded with Republican Appointees will they give the Louisiana 4 a get out of jail?
  Since the Justice Dept. is loaded with Republican Appointees will they give the Louisiana 4 a get out of jail free card?
  
  Answer:-That is exactly the kind of dirty tricks the Republicans are famous for. It does make you wonder why the Republicans have so many personal holds on Democrat Justice appointees does it not?
• Question:-Why does the Obama administration Justice Dept argue for DADT?
  The Justice Department will often argue for cases contrary to positions the president has publicly taken - such as Obama favoring repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell while the Justice Department argues for the policy after courts ruled it constitutional. The Obama Justice Dept. has also written a brief that seemed to compare homosexuality to pedophilia. Is it rational for people to be outraged at this, or is the Justice Dept. just doing their job? And..what exactly is their job?
  
  Answer:-Obama is a mentally disturbed @sshole.
  Not only does he want DADT voided BUT he doesn't want the courts to void it he wants congress to void it!
  So he spends millions of the taxpayers hard earned money to get the same basic results but via a different method! And that's if he is successful!
  The @sshole has definite mental problems and should be impeached before he can do any more damage!
• Question:-Why did South Carolina pass a voter suppression law so blatantly illegal the justice dept. had to step in?
  COLUMBIA, S.C. — The Justice Department on Friday rejected South Carolina's law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls, saying it makes it harder for minorities to cast ballots.
  
  The Justice Department must approve changes to South Carolina's election laws under the federal Voting Rights Act because of the state's past failure to protect the voting rights of blacks. It is one of nine states that require the agency's approval.
  
  Answer:-I don't get the legitimate objection to identifying yourself when casting a vote. I can certainly see the illegitimate reason one might not want to.
  
  Could you explain the objection, and how does it affect blacks one way ot the other?
• Question:-Why would the Justice Dept. go after Gibson Guitar for wood purchase that broke some law in India and?
  totally ignore the voter intimidation and fraud by the black panthers? That was an easy case with film and witnesses and was a serious crime. Am I the only one with serious concerns about the Department of Justice?
  
  Answer:-Because Gibson is the ultimate responsibility where their raw material comes from and what vendors collect. They are being investigated for using endangered species of rosewood. There are endangered plant species, just as illegal to use as animals. Would you feel the same if they were using tiger skins on their instruments?
  
  As for those "Black Panthers" (both of them). It was investigated with no evidence of intimidation. Two guys showing off in front of a camera is not evidence of a crime, of idiocy, perhaps, but not a crime.
• Question:-Why is it that according to US Justice dept Blacks murder at 7 times the rate of whites if you include?
  Hispanics it is 9 times so how do you explain this?
  
  Answer:-Please prove your claim with a link to those FBI figures not an Op/Ed piece.
• Question:-Why did John Ashcroft cover up the boobs on the the symbol of the Justice Dept?
  Didn't he cover up the boobs on that statue? That was his first priority?! What was wrong with these republicans?
  
  Answer:-He was unable to deal with the guilt of what he had done to her.
• Question:-Does the California Dept of Justice have updated information on criminal records?
  My record was expunged this past summer which was a battery misdemanor charge.I just recieved a letter from the california dept of health stating that they have recieved information from the ca dept of justice that I have been convicted with battery but the case was dismissed and which is now disturbed the peace, why is my record not showing that the case was dismissed and what can I do so I can get my license with the ca dept of health?
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Why do right wingers thinks the Justice Dept. should ignore Supreme Court ruling regarding immigration laws?
  The Supreme Court has already ruled that the Congressional power to regulate naturalization, in Article 1, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution States also includes the power to regulate immigration.
  
  Answer:-Because SB1070 is one step closer to the unchecked police powers, door to door searches, detainment camps and racial purification that their core members all fondly dream of every night.
  
  A DOJ inquiry threatens to put the brakes on their shared right wing utopia.
  
  The thing to remember is - liberals all ready won this battle. Jan Brewer et al issued an addendum within 2 weeks of the law passage that severely limited the most offensive parts of her misguided, politically motivated, moronic legislation.
• Question:-If the government abolished plea bargaining, how long would it take the justice dept. To process a years wortf?
  What I mean is how long would it take them to process the average amount of cases a year, including plea bargaining, under the new system, no plea bargaining?
  
  Answer:-

south carolina debate

• Question:-Who won the Republican South Carolina Debate?
  A. McCain
  B. Giuliani
  C. Huckabee
  D. Romney
  E. Paul
  F. Fred Tompson ... leaving him off was unintentional.
  My favorite is Giuliani... I'm watching the debate now.
  
  Answer:-I don't know if I could decide a winner in the debate but you left off Thompson and Fox focus group seemed to favor him though several said they'd still not vote for him.
  Paul won the viewer text vote.
  Do you have a favorite in the race? I'm still undecided.
• Question:-Immediately after the CNN South Carolina debate. Times magazine said Obama won. Can anyone find the clip?
  Immediately following the debate Anderson Cooper asked a Times magazine reporter who he thought won. He gave Obama an A- and gave Hillary and Edwards a C+. The clip has been pulled from the CNN website and now I cannot find it on youtube. Does anyone have the clip?
  
  Answer:-HA HA good try....
• Question:-Why does the south carolina republican debate audience look like a Klan rally?
  The audience is a white as snow. That is not representative of America.
  @answerers: I love to see the true venom and hate coming out you righties. You are losing control without Atwater or Rove around. I love it. Independents will not however..hee hee.
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Who is going to be the moderator for the next debate in South Carolina?
  I believe that Fox News is hosting the debate, but thus far I have been unable to find out who the moderator(s) will be.
  
  It is not listed on either the Fox website or the S. Carolina Republicans website.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Answer:-Paul
• Question:-May 5 South Carolina debate Roemer, Santorum, Pawlenty, Paul, Gingrich. What do you think?
  http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room
  
  Answer:-Gingrich will win any debate that he is in. He is the most savvy and knowledgeable about the constitution and the historical facts about the US
• Question:-At the South Carolina GOP debate, why was there laughter when Paul was asked a question he couldn't hear?
  At first I thought people were laughing because he probably wasn't paying attention the bullcrap the rest of the candidates throwing at each other as the debate when on.
  
  Answer:-they have been doing it on all the fox debates its BS but what do you expect , the fraud lies and obstruction of a viable candidate continues
• Question:-What's the average blood alcohol content of a South Carolina Republican debate audience member?
  .09? .12?
  RMPA - No thanks, I don't want some hill billy with beer breath yelling right at my face.
  
  Answer:-lol. that audience is full of a bunch of idiots
• Question:-May 5 South Carolina debate Roemer, Santorum, Pawlenty, Paul, Gingrich?
  http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room
  
  Answer:-Ron Paul.
• Question:-Hillary and Barrack made fools of themselves during yesterdays debate in South Carolina do you agree?
  How can the Democrats expect to be taken seriously after yesterday's debacle?
  Hillary and Barrack need to check their Ego at the door .
  Senator Edwards was the clear winner.
  
  Answer:-Hillary made a fool of herself.
  
  she said something that Obama though was wrong so he complained about it, he stood up for himself.
  
  Hillary sucks
• Question:-Why is Fox news completely ignoring Ron Paul in the South Carolina debate?
  only 1 question in 1 hour. This is censorship.
  
  Answer:-You are confusing Fox "News" with Journalism. It is "Entertainment Programming" with no obligation to the truth.
  
  Confusing "Fox News" with News is like confusing MXC with Professional Sports